HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory	9.7 GB free of 14.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091022
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '19 at 01:46
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 81.4 44% 66 Pts	4-Core 80 8-Core 80.1 11% 80.1 Pts	64-Core 80 5% 80 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 40.3 30% 35.9 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 36.4 31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 61 65 69 77 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 97.7 Write 95 Mixed 59.2 SusWrite 66.5 59% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 33 Write 24.7 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 13.4 19% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 67%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 320GB 653 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 37GB free, PID 2120 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.24% Terrible	Read 32 Write 26.2 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 12.2 29% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.24% Great: 18%
WD 1600BEA External 160GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 32GB free, PID 0702 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 26.8 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 12.1 29% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 17%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 842 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 0121 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	3.57% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 4.7 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 3.7 7% 6.43 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.57% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:85 9B CT51264BA1339.C16 ID:01 98 HP497157-D88-ELDW 50GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 91.9 44% 91.9 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	98x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	50x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	29x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	70x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	7x
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	7x
ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 540 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16