Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181208
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '19 at 21:14
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 71.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 227 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 683 71% 569 Pts	64-Core 860 53% 860 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 3102) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 22.1 18% 20.5 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 23.1 Splatting 17 17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 309 279 302 307 282 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	176% Outstanding	Read 1921 Write 1,170 Mixed 507 SusWrite 343 217% 985 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 45.9 165% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 709 DQ Write 546 DQ Mixed 618 465% 624 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 236%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 99GB free Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 381 361 384 386 275 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 420 Write 367 Mixed 257 SusWrite 359 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 34.5 113% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 84.5 68% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 297GB free Firmware: JPFOA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 89 93 93 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 89.2 Write 93.7 Mixed 52 SusWrite 90.9 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33 2,259 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 31GB free Firmware: PF2OA6EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 42 44 44 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 47.5 Write 46.5 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 42.6 32% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 297GB free Firmware: JPFOA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 85 89 89 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 95 Write 93.7 Mixed 52 SusWrite 86.7 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 35,395 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.7% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 26.5 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 22 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 97 41% 97 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)