Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 19:35
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 215
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 657
63% 518 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.9% Very good
Lighting 107
Reflection 114
Parallax 54
87% 91.7 fps
MRender 83.6
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 40.2
48% 61.6 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 276 270 262 268 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 337
Write 336
Mixed 303
SusWrite 284
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 37
126% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
163GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 355 369 365 316 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 344
Write 344
Mixed 298
SusWrite 355
76% 335 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 38.1
132% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 133 135 134 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 104
Mixed 61
SusWrite 135
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 84%
Generic Mass-Storage 134GB
121GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 7.2 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 1.2
Write 5.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 9.6
10% 6.62 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 3.3
298% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 42.9
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 20
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 117%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback