Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '19 at 05:26
Run Duration	409 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 50.5 1-Core 15.7 2-Core 113 33% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 85.9 8-Core 123 13% 104 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1435) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.7% Below average	Lighting 51.9 Reflection 80.3 Parallax 48.7 42% 60.3 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 27.3 Splatting 38.8 35% 43.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 0GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 409 Write 389 Mixed 322 83% 373 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 40.3 128% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 322 252% 347 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41320RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 146 151 132 133 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60% Good	Read 303 Write 307 Mixed 178 SusWrite 136 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 25.1 81% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 223 193% 289 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$69 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 21GB free Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 121 138 163 160 167 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 412 Write 307 Mixed 245 SusWrite 148 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 22.6 73% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 289 232% 327 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 56GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.4 11 18 20 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 48GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 142 170 214 272 264 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 398 Write 348 Mixed 328 SusWrite 202 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 38.6 122% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 359 269% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 44GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 182 188 157 154 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55% Above average	Read 255 Write 241 Mixed 164 SusWrite 162 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 20.8 60% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 314 247% 342 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 134%
ASMT 2105 250GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 34GB free, PID 5136 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 118 138 157 178 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 203 Mixed 168 SusWrite 140 238% 176 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 10.8 901% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.9 DQ Write 31.2 DQ Mixed 22.5 1,893% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 171%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 1,104 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 10.7 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,614x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	441x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	222x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	400x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	227x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	155x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	108x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16