Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130805
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '19 at 02:26
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 133 58% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 458 44% 361 Pts	64-Core 989 61% 989 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.3% Below average	Lighting 42.4 Reflection 38.5 Parallax 51.5 35% 44.1 fps	MRender 53.5 Gravity 48.8 Splatting 36.1 37% 46.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 731GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 390 391 391 394 395 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 454 Mixed 432 SusWrite 392 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 41.1 133% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 270 203% 272 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320 2,669 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 398GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 217 218 218 219 219 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69% Good	Read 238 Write 220 Mixed 218 SusWrite 218 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 36.8 120% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 193 145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 130%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB 2,362 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 588GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 82 81 81 80 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.2% Average	Read 269 Write 166 Mixed 194 SusWrite 81.2 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 21.7 71% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 70.5 DQ Mixed 69.4 58% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 97%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320 2,669 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 715GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 218 219 219 220 221 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.1% Good	Read 239 Write 227 Mixed 213 SusWrite 219 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 36.7 120% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 194 146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 130%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB 1,184 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 145 147 148 146 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 146 Write 137 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 146 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 100%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 80 80 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 128 Write 106 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 79.3 124% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 167% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB 8,040 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 18GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.9 9.9 10 10 10 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 31 Write 9.5 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 10.1 21% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.5 148% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-130.A 4x8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.9% Average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16