Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '19 at 11:08
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 136
60% 97 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 426
41% 336 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 81.2
54% 71.7 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 54.8
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 102 102 125 94 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 425
Write 312
Mixed 305
SusWrite 130
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 16.3
55% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 41.8
46% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
446GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 121 121 122 120 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 168
Write 151
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 119
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 112%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
165GB free
Firmware: 02.03B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 84 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 84.7
Write 81
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 83.8
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 64%
Toshiba MK7575GSX 750GB-$63
229GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 63 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 64
Write 65.2
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 62.5
38% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback