| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
| System | MSI MS-7994 |
| Motherboard | MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994) (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161216 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 09 '19 at 15:57 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Extreme |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
42.4%
Average
|
50% 105 Pts
|
32% 242 Pts
|
18% 270 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
|
29.4%
Poor
|
31% 98.5 fps
|
30% 84.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$110
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 345 359 371 379 376 MB/s
|
82%
Excellent
|
80% 357 MB/s
|
96% 32.6 MB/s
|
259% 349 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
931GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 202 204 204 202 204 MB/s
|
116%
Outstanding
|
119% 164 MB/s
|
152% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 1TB
32GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 28 28 27 28 30 MB/s
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
21% 16.4 MB/s
|
45% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
46.9%
Average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
34% 118 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical H110M ECO (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,599 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $182Bench 63%, 109,797 samples | 244x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $179Bench 59%, 93,052 samples | 166x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $122Bench 61%, 41,385 samples | 149x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 32%, 464,235 samples | 264x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $280Bench 57%, 752,541 samples | 214x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 6%, 85,003 samples | 137x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $465 |