Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 101 2-Core 200 69% 124 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 379 51% 378 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 848E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.23% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 2 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.23% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 11 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.6 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 414 Write 399 Mixed 328 SusWrite 33.1 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 29.2 102% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 167 160% 247 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 100%
Adata XPG EX500 500GB 487 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 402GB free Firmware: 9301 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 31 30 28 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 16 Write 12.1 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 30.6 17% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GB 10,940 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16