To Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	To Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190327
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '19 at 19:37
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 96 1-Core 108 2-Core 202 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 503 55% 433 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% MSI(1462 3050) 2GB CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 40.7 27% 35 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 29.5 Splatting 36.1 26% 31 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD-69D03092M-T 80GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 65 64 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 144 Write 69.5 Mixed 92.8 SusWrite 65.5 21% 93 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 16.7 64% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 79.2 DQ Write 66.4 DQ Mixed 66 51% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 41%
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$50 8,525 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 163GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 56 56 57 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 57.7 Write 63.8 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 55.1 42% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 52%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 27GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 25 27 24 24 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 159 Write 46 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 37.6 86% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.8 158% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5273DH0- 2x4GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68.5% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 22.8 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 13.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	504x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	215x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	95x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	140x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	112x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	47x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	42x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	190x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16