Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '19 at 19:46
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	3%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 85.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 195 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 420 35% 303 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2546 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Lighting 58.5 Reflection 71.8 Parallax 63.5 48% 64.6 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 58.8 Splatting 66.3 53% 64.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ2 256GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 206 211 215 220 206 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 641 Write 727 Mixed 304 SusWrite 252 108% 481 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 23.1 96% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 293 220% 296 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 119%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 641GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 84 83 86 87 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 66.6 Write 93.5 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 83.8 55% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.1 188% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	46% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 11.9 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	732x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	635x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	199x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16