ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu FMVNS8BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Fujitsu FMVNS8BC (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB1D3
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090205
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '19 at 19:55
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T8100-$78 2,639 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 30.9 2-Core 58.5 37% 53.2 Pts	4-Core 57.2 8-Core 58.5 8% 57.8 Pts	64-Core 60.1 4% 60.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fujitsu(10CF 13F7) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.21% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.2 fps	MRender 0.14 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.18 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.21% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 34 29 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 37.3 Mixed 27 SusWrite 26.2 24% 32 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 34%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 755GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 14.3 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 22.1 26% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 6,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4 4.3 3.4 3.5 3.8 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Read 27.2 Write 4.3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 3.7 10% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback