| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180820 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 16 '19 at 13:17 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
81% 147 Pts
|
71% 575 Pts
|
58% 945 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.7%
Poor
|
30% 33.9 fps
|
29% 35.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 54 22 73 48 31 MB/s
|
41.1%
Average
|
81% 362 MB/s
|
54% 15.6 MB/s
|
9% 15.2 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
325GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 98 98 99 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
74% 101 MB/s
|
230% 1.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.6%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
49% 80.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 543 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 68x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 60x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 40x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 38x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $284 |