Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '19 at 22:35
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Memory 76.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 233 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 850 84% 688 Pts	64-Core 1,052 65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 861D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.5% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 133 Parallax 108 98% 120 fps	MRender 95.1 Gravity 125 Splatting 102 88% 107 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 350 367 330 327 318 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 440 Write 389 Mixed 374 SusWrite 355 88% 389 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 54.4 183% 65.6 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 340 255% 341 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 256GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 78 75 90 74 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 30.5 Write 68.2 Mixed 29 SusWrite 81.2 38% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 76%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 850GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 45 52 72 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 47.5 Write 74 Mixed 21 SusWrite 56.6 36% 49.8 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 964GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 79 91 82 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 10.7 Write 45.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 80.8 29% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 882GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.2 2.9 15 29 18 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Read 2.2 Write 2 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 11.6 4% 4.82 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 59%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 33GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 40 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 25 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 39 40% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB 859B CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.2% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 23.6 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 23.7 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,933x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	540x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	270x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	479x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	304x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	224x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	154x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,035

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16