PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131002 |
Uptime | 5.8 Days |
Run Date | Jul 23 '19 at 16:12 |
Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
49.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
PNY(196E 11D8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22
|
59.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 66 81 88 94 95 MB/s
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
|
22.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 58x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |