Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 166 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 77.1 24% 150 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0493) 512MB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 369.9 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	1.65% Terrible	Lighting 2.27 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 0.56 2% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 0.09 1% 1.78 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$80 26,761 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 191 189 192 190 182 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 431 Write 249 Mixed 186 SusWrite 192 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 14.2 59% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 246 192% 268 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KX830D-ELC 1x4GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1,632x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	355x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	149x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	76x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	73x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	64x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16