Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '19 at 19:46
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	Memory 88.8 1-Core 142 2-Core 262 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 834 80% 662 Pts	64-Core 1,368 85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2487) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 22.7 Parallax 18.5 16% 20.3 fps	MRender 27.9 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 25.6 20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 461GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 462 468 468 468 472 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 463 Mixed 381 SusWrite 462 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 46.2 159% 56.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 346 262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 106 100 105 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 106 Write 108 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 104 67% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB 29,525 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	59.9% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 18.1 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 20.7 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 120%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	67x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	49x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	44x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	26x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBKingstonBench 94%, 31,785 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	11x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,056

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16