PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus Z97-A (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140508 |
Uptime | 14.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '19 at 17:09 |
Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
87.4%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 355.82
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$155
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 395 401 408 398 403 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
161GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 108 107 107 MB/s
|
64.1%
Good
|
|||
ASMT ASM1156-PM 500GB
464GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 10 11 10 11 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
ASMT ASM1156-PM 2TB
271GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.1 3.2 3 3.2 3.2 MB/s
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Disk Name 500GB
54GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 2,304x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 1,184x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 420x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 789x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 341x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 307x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $798 |