Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131009
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '19 at 12:59
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 194 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 480 51% 408 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800 2,114 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	7.08% Terrible	Lighting 9.5 Reflection 8.23 Parallax 4.34 8% 7.36 fps	MRender 8.62 Gravity 7.13 Splatting 6 6% 7.25 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.08% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 960GB 3,595 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 616GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 232 8.9 13 13 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 901 Write 244 Mixed 377 SusWrite 128 90% 412 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 24.7 102% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 65.6 108% 208 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 291%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 610GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 124 120 125 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 120 Write 118 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 122 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 60 58 59 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 100 Write 96.7 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 58.4 52% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 83%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 946GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 121 116 118 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 124 Write 102 Mixed 38 SusWrite 118 70% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 87 86 85 87 88 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 94.5 Write 100 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 85.5 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 190GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 73 72 76 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 77.7 Write 75 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 74.3 56% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 76GB free Firmware: PB3OC60G SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 50 50 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	30% Poor	Read 54.7 Write 53.8 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 49.5 35% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 42%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 46GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 35.7 Write 41 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 38.6 27% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 44%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 93GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 36.7 Write 37.5 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 34.8 26% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 4x4GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	82% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 30.1 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UD5 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	74x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	52x
Core i7-3930KIntelBench 77%, 4,060 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	8x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	5x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	8x
16G-D3-2133-M 2x8GBUnknownBench 45%, 39 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 64%, 1,012 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16