Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99X Killer (all builds)
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160322
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '19 at 14:18
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 93.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 268 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 810 79% 646 Pts	64-Core 1,064 66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% EVGA(3842 2173) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 121 Parallax 117 104% 122 fps	MRender 165 Gravity 121 Splatting 94.7 100% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LX001-1RG174 500GB 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 372 332 336 327 335 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 468 Write 454 Mixed 379 SusWrite 360 308% 415 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 93.6 4K Mixed 43.1 7,797% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 353 3,232% 352 MB/s

WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268 8,165 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 382GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 159 158 158 158 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 148 Mixed 102 SusWrite 158 107% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.7 340% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 117%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25 4,291 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 59GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 13 22 20 20 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 37 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 19.6 43% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.6 90% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 2,702 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 45.7 MC Write 47.7 MC Mixed 44.1 131% 45.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 20.1 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	143x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	42x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	18x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
BL8G36C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GBUnknownBench 96%, 5,257 samples	12x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 87%, 2,702 samples	9x
DDR4 2800 2OZ 4x8GBUnknownBench 86%, 829 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $923

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16