PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell XPS 8300 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0Y2MRG |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110215 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 07 '19 at 10:34 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 96 104 105 107 105 MB/s
|
80%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
70GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 104 105 105 104 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 Samsung M391B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 1,307x |
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 121x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 71x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 178x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 114x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 106x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $333 |