PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V LE (all builds) |
Memory | 2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130909 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 09 '19 at 06:47 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 46% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1296 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 286 263 252 254 254 MB/s
|
80.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
226GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 166 169 168 169 MB/s
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
499GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 276 282 290 291 292 MB/s
|
82.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
41.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 183x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 132x |
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 58x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $443 |