PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B17 |
Motherboard | MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B17) (all builds) |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190325 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 09 '19 at 07:28 |
Run Duration | 204 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
87.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396
Zotac(19DA 3507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
||||
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54
29GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 335 383 328 314 318 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54
25GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 341 394 339 319 313 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
48GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 163 172 155 150 144 MB/s
|
92%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
7GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 56 66 63 64 59 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
ST310005 28AS 1TB
9GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 41 42 41 41 39 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
24GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 37 37 37 MB/s
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
66%
Good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 2,759x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 2,433x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 1,071x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 759x |
RTX 2080Nvidia $396Bench 124%, 316,424 samples | 589x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 578x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 115% - Outstanding | Total price: $833 |