Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190116
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '19 at 06:16
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 70 1-Core 94.6 2-Core 188 66% 118 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 610 58% 481 Pts	64-Core 998 62% 998 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.1% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 45.7 Parallax 37.2 32% 40.9 fps	MRender 56.7 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 51.7 40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 210 219 192 191 151 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 421 Write 258 Mixed 266 SusWrite 197 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 30 120% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 116 114% 180 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 146GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 468 469 473 473 475 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 469 Mixed 404 SusWrite 468 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 54.7 180% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 362 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 134%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70 21,848 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 695GB free Firmware: 0003HPM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 109 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 112 Write 106 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 109 70% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 62%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$39 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 466GB free Firmware: 0001DEM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 107 105 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 108 Write 82.3 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 106 65% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2.5TB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 119 113 121 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 96.8 Write 98.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 115 68% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.1 174% 1 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 13,788 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.1% Good	MC Read 28 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 25.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 19.8 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,056

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)