Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 10:38
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
38.2% Below average
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 124
43% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 231
33% 238 Pts
64-Core 241
16% 241 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 242
Reflection 193
Parallax 209
61% 214 fps
MRender 158
Gravity 133
Splatting 138
43% 143 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$80
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 297 304 326 305 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 389
Mixed 360
SusWrite 300
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 46.6
154% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 248
189% 255 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$80
205GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 309 306 306 305 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 392
Write 314
Mixed 348
SusWrite 302
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 49.7
163% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 255
192% 258 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 124%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
758GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 108 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 108
116% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Team--Elite-1333 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $586
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $219
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $618SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback