Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 82% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator G9-793  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger2_SKS
Memory28.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 21:24
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 95.2
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 136
62% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 394
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.7% Poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 69.9
8% 30.5 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 85.7
63% 75.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 665 660 665 667 664 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 1,081
Mixed 929
SusWrite 685
220% 981 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 55.5
196% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 663
DQ Mixed 710
534% 716 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 183%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB
286GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 374 378 371 379 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 409
Write 376
Mixed 377
SusWrite 379
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 22.6
82% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 363
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
359GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 396 398 391 406 416 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 403
Write 398
Mixed 356
SusWrite 398
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 20.1
77% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3E2 HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3E2 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 24.5
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback