Monster TULPAR T7 V19.2

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V19.2 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.2
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190118
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '19 at 22:16
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 249 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 772 72% 602 Pts	64-Core 1,021 63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile) 23,316 User benchmarks, average bench 88% Device(1D05 105D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1971 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 114 Parallax 108 93% 112 fps	MRender 146 Gravity 101 Splatting 93.8 91% 114 fps
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 99%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59 34,063 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 260 259 257 262 262 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1113 Write 987 Mixed 354 SusWrite 258 150% 678 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 68.7 202% 74.1 MB/s	DQ Read 724 DQ Write 713 DQ Mixed 489 431% 642 MB/s
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 271%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$60 4,559 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 194GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 70 70 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 70.3 Write 67.5 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 68.7 48% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 22.4 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 25.7 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.2 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.2

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	6x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	5x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	2x
RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples	1x

SSD
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $59Bench 213%, 34,063 samples	2x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	1x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	1x

RAM
1x16GBUnknownBench 53%, 15,722 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x
CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 65%, 1,143 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16