Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 836B
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190508
Uptime	8.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '19 at 19:07
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 108 2-Core 188 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 562 56% 456 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 836B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6194 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.96% Terrible	Lighting 7.03 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 7 6% 8.19 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 6.77 Splatting 14.7 9% 11 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.96% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 836B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 9.77 Reflection 23.6 Parallax 34.1 8% 22.5 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 36 Splatting 34.9 30% 36.2 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 44,050 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 223 193 156 133 118 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 1,079 Write 254 Mixed 374 SusWrite 184 103% 473 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 44.7 158% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 412 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 293 242% 347 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 193%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 158GB free Firmware: RXM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 100 99 97 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 72.6 Write 112 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 98.3 64% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MD-8 2x8GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.9% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 21.8 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 19.8 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,405x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	982x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	48x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	212x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	102x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	91x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	240x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	210x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	148x

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $33

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16