Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime5 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 21:52
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7600K-$251
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72.3% Very good
1-Core 121
2-Core 249
87% 185 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 423
61% 443 Pts
64-Core 414
28% 414 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$722
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 119
Reflection 118
Parallax 118
31% 119 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 119
Splatting 119
36% 119 fps
Poor: 95%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 163 147 143 164 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 442
Mixed 344
SusWrite 176
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 56.8
196% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 231
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 117%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 155 152 161 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 129
Write 98.7
Mixed 85
SusWrite 154
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81%
Great: 102%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$86
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 131 132 132 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 147
Write 113
Mixed 75
SusWrite 130
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 182 186 185 186 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 164
Mixed 77
SusWrite 185
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 25.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 22
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 2,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $234

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,271
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $238Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback