PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L (all builds) |
Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090601 |
Uptime | 6 Days |
Run Date | Aug 24 '19 at 22:03 |
Run Duration | 204 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 55% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5310
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
|
33.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Asus(1043 8321) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
0.54%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 88 84 74 91 77 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
|||
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
19GB free
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 14 17 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
69GB free
Firmware: HH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 14 17 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
FUJITSU MHZ2250BS G2 250GB
12GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 15 15 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
|||
Sony Storage Media 64GB
6GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5 5.9 6.6 5.4 6 MB/s
|
6.05%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
40GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 11 11 10 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
13.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 25x |
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples | 19x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 15x |
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 13x |
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $130 |