Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 61.4 2-Core 130 56% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 419 39% 323 Pts	64-Core 1,280 79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 411.63 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	9.94% Terrible	Lighting 11.1 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 16.4 9% 13.7 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 14 Splatting 13.2 12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.94% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 86 107 107 110 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 306 Write 210 Mixed 229 SusWrite 108 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 32.1 106% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 83.4 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 167 112% 133 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 85%
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH1ZABHA 256GB 909 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 209GB free Firmware: M504 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 237 238 237 239 238 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.5% Good	Read 243 Write 240 Mixed 217 SusWrite 237 53% 234 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 29.8 104% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 135 108% 152 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 105%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 688GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 165 157 161 167 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 248 Write 214 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 160 129% 177 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.4 301% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 223%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 HMT31GR7C... 96GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	88.3% Excellent	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 35.7 MC Mixed 33 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.6 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16