Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics 19,683 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	39% Below average	Memory 59.5 1-Core 33.3 2-Core 60.9 34% 51.2 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 101 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	1.64% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 2.59 1% 2.69 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 3.04 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.64% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB 3,843 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: JULA1102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 174 222 228 271 213 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 355 Write 329 Mixed 336 SusWrite 222 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 21.9 64% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 176 131% 174 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B1G73DB0-YK0 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 12GB 800, 800 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.7% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 7.2 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.6 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	205x
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 3,779 samples	102x
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	92x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	202x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	102x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	94x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	54x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	25x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	12x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16