Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T7400 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0RW199
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120430
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '19 at 03:01
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420 603 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 35.9 2-Core 72 39% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 261 24% 201 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.2 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
As201 120GB 120GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFC SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 48 36 46 25 10 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.4% Above average	Read 248 Write 234 Mixed 206 SusWrite 43.9 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 26.1 105% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 97.2 DQ Mixed 1.3 36% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 84%
Ibm-esxs ST8000NM0095 E5 8TB 3.5TB free Firmware: ECE2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 46 45 45 45 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.2% Very poor	Read 198 Write 44.5 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 45.2 18% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 11.2 4K Mixed 1.7 11% 4.97 MB/s	DQ Read 3.9 DQ Write 10.5 DQ Mixed 2.2 3% 5.53 MB/s

Hitachi HUS726040ALS214 4TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2TB free Firmware: MS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 162 Write 42.5 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 43.1 56% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 65%
Hitachi HUA72202 2TB 449 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 307GB free Firmware: A3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 69 68 69 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 72.7 Write 79.8 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 68.1 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 71%
Hitachi HUA72202 2TB 449 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 785GB free Firmware: A3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 77 74 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 74 Write 80.8 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 75.8 52% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 71%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 495GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 74 71 73 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 67 Write 69.5 Mixed 45 SusWrite 72.5 47% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.8 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 5 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54721stBench 48%, 256 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54401stBench 46%, 452 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	49x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	18x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16