PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130423 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 31 '19 at 13:49 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
61.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1328 MHz, MLim: 1854 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 184 165 167 178 167 MB/s
|
66.1%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
168GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 97 99 MB/s
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
28GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 268x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 184x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 134x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 64x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 49x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $175 |