Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 154% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 153% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '19 at 21:15
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Memory 84.1 1-Core 152 2-Core 305 97% 180 Pts	4-Core 599 8-Core 1,004 98% 801 Pts	64-Core 1,471 91% 1,471 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37BD) CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	159% Outstanding	Lighting 223 Reflection 226 Parallax 213 182% 221 fps	MRender 248 Gravity 216 Splatting 137 157% 200 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 13,766 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 294 290 284 276 276 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	145% Outstanding	Read 1,008 Write 306 Mixed 328 SusWrite 286 106% 482 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 41.6 194% 77.2 MB/s	DQ Read 985 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 410 364% 568 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 147%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 109GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 275 276 275 276 276 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 308 Mixed 384 SusWrite 291 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 59.7 206% 73.3 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 230 209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 142GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 277 279 277 277 282 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 296 Mixed 346 SusWrite 299 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 58.2 203% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 235 212% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 109GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 486 448 485 474 440 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 332 Mixed 373 SusWrite 468 94% 421 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 47 172% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 177 177% 287 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 801GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 488 491 492 494 496 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 493 Mixed 464 SusWrite 492 111% 491 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 62.2 212% 76.3 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 364 274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 37.9 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 38 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)