Acer Aspire TC-220

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire TC-220 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-220
Memory	21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160426
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '19 at 07:45
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	47.1% Average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 63.4 2-Core 118 50% 83.3 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 181 21% 164 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 31 29% 31.5 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 34.7 30% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 142 137 95 49 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 357 Write 294 Mixed 281 SusWrite 113 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 20 74% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 27.5 47% 94.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 95%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 732GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 259 254 278 292 286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 330 Write 299 Mixed 306 SusWrite 262 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 24.8 79% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 187 141% 191 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$99 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 151 151 154 152 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	76% Very good	Read 113 Write 125 Mixed 111 SusWrite 151 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.7 306% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 90%
USB 3.0 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 209GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.4% Very poor	Read 36 Write 32.7 Mixed 34 SusWrite 17.7 22% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 5.5 955% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 18%
USB 3.0 2TB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 29.8 Mixed 28 SusWrite 17.8 20% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.1 65% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 106%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 14 14 13 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 128 Write 41.5 Mixed 27 SusWrite 14.5 54% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.5 124% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 14 14 13 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 121 Write 39.5 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 13.5 56% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.2 109% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 32%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB 583 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 329GB free, PID 0105 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 17.7 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 19.2 32% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 23%
ST332082 0A 320GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 250GB free, PID 0275 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 18 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 17.2 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 18.5 30% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 19%
HGST_HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 730GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 130 132 133 133 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.3% Above average	Read 137 Write 118 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 132 138% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G CT102464BA160B.M16 Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.9% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 13.6 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 7.3 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-220 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-220

CPU
A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 41%, 15,719 samples	69x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	9x
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	20x
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
RBU-SC150S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 61%, 189 samples	2x

RAM
ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 2,154 samples	13x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 7,869 samples	8x
ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 1,171 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16