Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181011
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 75 1-Core 142 2-Core 284 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 583 67% 522 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design 1,537 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9835 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 26.7 8% 16.1 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 27.2 Splatting 21.9 20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 191 186 198 200 199 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 360 Write 261 Mixed 190 SusWrite 196 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 13.6 64% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 268 221% 318 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 92%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: SDM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 127 125 125 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 118 Write 113 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 125 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB 6,645 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	75.3% Very good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 22.2 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 24.8 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	131x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	86x
GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 21%, 1,537 samples	45x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	81x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	17x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 6,645 samples	131x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16