PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock P55DE3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091102 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Sep 12 '19 at 12:12 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
52%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1475 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
|
45.6%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
56GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
304GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 116 116 116 116 116 MB/s
|
61.6%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.2 3.3 4.1 3.4 4 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
275GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 24 25 25 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 15x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 12x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 4x |
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $431 |