Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181011
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 04:35
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.8% Above average
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 191
69% 145 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 470
52% 399 Pts
64-Core 464
31% 464 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1481) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 26.7
6% 35.9 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 22
Splatting 37.6
8% 28.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 199 198 203 201 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 356
Write 315
Mixed 277
SusWrite 204
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 14.2
51% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 255
214% 310 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 129 130 130 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 130
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
71.1% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 20.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 22.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $238Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback