Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 131% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '19 at 23:47
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 67.5 1-Core 148 2-Core 296 90% 170 Pts	4-Core 585 8-Core 1,147 102% 866 Pts	64-Core 2,050 127% 2,050 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6393) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 177 Reflection 197 Parallax 193 144% 189 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 179 Splatting 123 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 934 1160 839 804 800 797 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 1,576 Write 1,468 Mixed 1,184 SusWrite 889 287% 1,279 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 59.3 192% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1306 DQ Write 1,134 DQ Mixed 1,206 908% 1,216 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 918GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1307 1382 1368 1115 1104 1106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 1,562 Write 1,444 Mixed 1,171 SusWrite 1,230 304% 1,352 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 53.6 176% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,425 DQ Write 1,299 DQ Mixed 1,342 1,012% 1,355 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 410%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 11GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 321 Write 298 Mixed 254 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 28.1 95% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 196 147% 195 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 177GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 79 79 80 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 111 Write 109 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 78.7 65% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 69%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 128 131 131 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 139 Write 134 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 130 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 88%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 146 152 151 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 146 Write 142 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 149 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 113 124 121 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 136 Write 120 Mixed 70 SusWrite 118 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.1% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 23.7 68% 24 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 22.4 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,024x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	738x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	558x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	366x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	338x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	416x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	350x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	218x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	126x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	109x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16