Notebook P65_67HSHP

Performance Results

Gaming 26%
Desktop 46%
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNotebook P65_67HSHP  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65_67HSHP
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170223
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 16:58
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29% Poor
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 85.5
33% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 226
25% 195 Pts
64-Core 251
17% 251 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 60
Parallax 202
22% 107 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 138
Splatting 174
44% 147 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 79%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7201Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,543
Write 24.5
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 23.4
137% 660 MB/s
4K Read 308
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.8
472% 104 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 228%
Great: 206%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
770GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 35 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 2.2
Write 29.2
Mixed 3
SusWrite 35.5
13% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P65_67HSHP Builds (Compare 841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 62%
Desktop 78%
Workstation 51%

System: Notebook P65_67HSHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $100
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback