Asus B85M-G

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140613
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '19 at 12:43
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 91.1 2-Core 184 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 345 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 6.15 Parallax 5.81 3% 5.14 fps	MRender 8.29 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 7.26 5% 5.92 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541A SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 56 61 56 54 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 125 Write 96.8 Mixed 91 SusWrite 59.1 21% 93 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 87.9 4K Mixed 10.4 75% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 30 DQ Write 78.5 DQ Mixed 51.1 40% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 802GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 28 25 23 24 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 86.2 Write 51 Mixed 26 SusWrite 20.9 34% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 263GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 71 74 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 67 Write 49.8 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 73.5 43% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 43%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB 1,938 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 29GB free, PID 5595 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 21 22 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 17.3 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 20.9 30% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.6 126% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 37%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 3321 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 202 197 187 200 200 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 185 Write 135 Mixed 66 SusWrite 195 190% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 3,744 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 17.4 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	958x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	785x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	532x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	480x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	401x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	368x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	259x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	163x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	156x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16