Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '19 at 12:45
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 174 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 350 47% 349 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E258) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.2 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 25.8 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 31 21% 28.7 fps	MRender 26.7 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 31.4 23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 296 Write 343 Mixed 356 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 41.8 135% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 212 161% 216 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 330GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 99 97 95 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 99.7 Write 96.1 Mixed 56 SusWrite 96.7 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 858GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 94 94 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 50.9 Write 62.4 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 92.9 42% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.4% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 11.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	88x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	75x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	31x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	10x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x

RAM
DDR3 1600G 2x4GBUnknownBench 51%, 1,144 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $575

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16