Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 115 2-Core 230 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 455 58% 439 Pts	64-Core 436 27% 436 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1973 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.9% Below average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 51.8 Parallax 46.6 49% 52.7 fps	MRender 44.2 Gravity 50.6 Splatting 0.04 23% 31.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 40 13 5.3 7.5 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 396 Write 188 Mixed 221 SusWrite 43.5 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 16.7 61% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 70 DQ Write 44.4 DQ Mixed 26 28% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FE 1x16GB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 12.8 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	33x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
M378A1G43TB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,626 samples	15x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $424

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16