Asrock H87M

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87M (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160108
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3420-$53 4,757 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 61.2 1-Core 92.1 2-Core 182 62% 112 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 152 22% 161 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 16.9 16% 17.4 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 16.8 16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75 15,430 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 109 109 109 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 391 Write 124 Mixed 183 SusWrite 102 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 14.5 65% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 135 113% 166 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 77%
Maxtor STM3160815AS 160GB 2,329 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 21GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 51 55 54 55 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 44.3 Write 18 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 51.9 26% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 8.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M - $151

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	28x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	9x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	8x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	9x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
730 Series 240GBIntel $250Bench 84%, 8,417 samples	3x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	5x
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $294

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16