Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180712
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '19 at 19:16
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 70.4 1-Core 109 2-Core 196 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 633 58% 483 Pts	64-Core 837 52% 837 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 861E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.6% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 121 Parallax 107 87% 112 fps	MRender 87.1 Gravity 102 Splatting 92.7 77% 94 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 222 206 210 198 219 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 451 Write 354 Mixed 304 SusWrite 231 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 29.6 74% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 103%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 31GB free Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 73 69 56 80 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 455 Write 432 Mixed 301 SusWrite 94.8 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 37 123% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 247 210% 309 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 101%
Samsung HD754JJ 750GB 741 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 678GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 135 135 134 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 132 Write 47.5 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 135 71% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 75%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 8GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 125 Write 24.7 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 14.8 57% 54 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 50% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 24%
Innostor Innostor 16GB 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 11GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 15 14 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 98.2 Write 15 Mixed 15 SusWrite 14.5 34% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1 58% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.5% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 25.1 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 20.2 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,435x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	281x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)