Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190909
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '19 at 21:09
Run Duration	332 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Memory 79.2 1-Core 146 2-Core 291 93% 172 Pts	4-Core 571 8-Core 810 87% 691 Pts	64-Core 1,045 65% 1,045 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 147 Parallax 137 110% 140 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 133 Splatting 110 97% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 272GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2268 590 588 591 589 591 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	309% Outstanding	Read 2,586 Write 2,352 Mixed 1,519 SusWrite 870 409% 1,832 MB/s	4K Read 70.2 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 95.5 320% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 1,280 DQ Write 1,110 DQ Mixed 1,174 886% 1,188 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 309% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 272GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2286 2213 1108 1115 1117 1116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	345% Outstanding	Read 2,544 Write 2,382 Mixed 1,585 SusWrite 1,492 448% 2,001 MB/s	4K Read 66 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 90.8 304% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,377 DQ Write 1,225 DQ Mixed 1,277 964% 1,293 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 345% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 88GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 456 457 456 455 455 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 449 Mixed 386 SusWrite 456 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 58.2 192% 65.9 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 419GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 457 457 456 455 453 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 450 Mixed 371 SusWrite 456 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 94 4K Mixed 55.9 188% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 11GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 114 113 107 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 101 Write 72.7 Mixed 66 SusWrite 110 64% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 14GB free Firmware: MN6OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 92 96 90 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 86.2 Write 84 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 91.1 57% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 18GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 42 43 43 43 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 33.5 Write 42.7 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 43.3 28% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 34,561 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.1% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 30.2 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 28.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	869x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16