| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180803 |
| Uptime | 6.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 27 '19 at 16:36 |
| Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 67% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73%
Very good
|
66% 117 Pts
|
69% 577 Pts
|
63% 1,016 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.9%
Average
|
44% 56.2 fps
|
49% 58.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
50% 229 MB/s
|
40% 9.47 MB/s
| ||
|
|
934% 1,301 MB/s
|
38,390% 306 MB/s
| ||
|
|
92% 125 MB/s
|
212% 1.57 MB/s
| ||
|
|
933% 1,299 MB/s
|
38,856% 310 MB/s
| ||
|
|
80% 110 MB/s
|
151% 1.3 MB/s
| ||
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 132 132 131 131 MB/s
|
75.5%
Very good
|
87% 118 MB/s
|
180% 1.37 MB/s
| |
|
ADATA USB Flash Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID c72a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 5.1 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 MB/s
|
4.3%
Terrible
|
10% 9.55 MB/s
|
0% 0 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
47.8%
Average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
27% 9.6 GB/s
|
41% 97.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 493x |
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 260x |
| Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples | 148x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 168x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 151x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 92x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $777 |