PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7845 |
Motherboard | MSI Z87-GD65 GAMING (MS-7845) (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131203 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 30 '19 at 01:27 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 74% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 49 51 51 52 53 MB/s
|
89.2%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$96
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 119 121 122 120 MB/s
|
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1601 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 578x |
Core i5-4670KIntel $64Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 262x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 214x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 108x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 102x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 92x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $569 |