Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 11:49
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 260
94% 166 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 755
72% 597 Pts
64-Core 765
47% 765 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36% Below average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 44
38% 45.2 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 36.3
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36%
Great: 36%
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Lighting 8.33
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 8.28
7% 9.56 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 16.6
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 573 574 571 564 566 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,974
Write 1,664
Mixed 646
SusWrite 615
272% 1,225 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 60.2
240% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,108
DQ Write 1,191
DQ Mixed 849
722% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 241%
Great: 254%
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
63GB free
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 90 93 92 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44% Average
Read 247
Write 91.7
Mixed 116
SusWrite 91.8
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 20.8
79% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 60.6
55% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44%
Great: 45%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 200 194 201 200 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 194
Mixed 82
SusWrite 198
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.7
223% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 28.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 29.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $894
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback