Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	17.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '19 at 15:20
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 77.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 234 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 717 72% 588 Pts	64-Core 922 57% 922 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6286) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 150 Parallax 137 121% 145 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 142 Splatting 114 101% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 291 293 298 297 294 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 300 Mixed 306 SusWrite 295 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 35.1 143% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 246 208% 304 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 129%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43 14,860 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 223GB free Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 984 962 1038 914 991 1121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1,168 Write 1,302 Mixed 740 SusWrite 1,002 237% 1,053 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 55.5 192% 69 MB/s	DQ Read 896 DQ Write 753 DQ Mixed 570 497% 740 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 210%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 112GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 92 91 89 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 360 Write 110 Mixed 176 SusWrite 89.1 40% 184 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 36.3 137% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 92.9 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 103 79% 107 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 75%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 652GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 67 Mixed 52 SusWrite 46.7 43% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 179GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 113 114 114 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 112 73% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$83 8,676 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 30.2 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 20.2 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)